The Artistic Atom | Grably’s Vision for the Future of Art

 “I compare art to the discovery of the atom, and by that it is possible to explain, in a comprehensive manner, my opinion on the way of art in the year 2000. (It must be noted that the concept of the year 2000 expresses a symbol of a new era of sophistication and progress in all areas, and not necessarily 2000 years as a literal concept). Well, the atom is known as the tiniest particle in nature and it is the basis of everything, it is the beginning, the basis from which it is impossible to retreat, and so it happens in art. With artists like Cezanne, Matisse, and of course Picasso. If we look at paintings of artists from the centuries gone by, it is possible to notice their aspiration to arrive at the primary basis of form and basic shapes. These are the geometric shapes through which we assemble an entire world. Let's return to the atom. When, once researchers settled most of the questions surrounding the atom, two paths were discovered on the horizon. One is the good path, the use of the atom for peace purposes, to provide energy, to operate nuclear plants etc. The other path is the bad and wrong path, with which bombs are created. Back to art. Here too, two different and opposite paths are seen. Once art reaches the basis, the atom, the primary line, the virginal, the one which the bad artists took, they have reached a path with no way out. The road backwards, or more precisely, simply staying in one place. The continued failed efforts to perfect that which had reached past its minus point, the fundamentals. Like with the atom, it's the path of bombs, a path of self destruction and a vain display of muscle. The other road is the path of searching for new fundamental elements, of attempts to discover unknown basic elements. It's a road filled with new ideas, like the road to peace.”

Ehud Grably

In the expansive world of art, few analogies resonate as deeply or provocatively as Ehud Grably’s comparison of art to the discovery of the atom. This profound analogy, articulated by Grably during his lifetime, provides a comprehensive framework for understanding his vision of art in the new millennium. It underscores the fundamental principles of artistic creation and the divergent paths that artists can take as they explore the elemental core of their craft. Grably begins his analogy by likening the atom, the tiniest and most fundamental particle in nature, to the essential elements of art. Just as the atom is the building block of all matter, basic shapes and forms are the foundation of artistic expression. Grably cites masters like Paul Cézanne, Henri Matisse, and Pablo Picasso, whose works reflect a quest for these primary elements, reducing complex concepts to geometric forms that capture the essence of their subjects. This reduction to simplicity is not a retreat but a means to explore the most fundamental aspects of art, much like scientists studying the atom to understand the universe.

Grably draws a parallel between the scientific exploration of the atom and the artistic journey to the foundational elements of art. Grably notes that once scientists understood the atom, they faced two potential paths, one that led to constructive uses and means, such as generating energy and advancing technology, and another path that led to destruction, epitomised by atomic bombs. Similarly, in art, reaching the primary basis of artistic creation can lead artists down two divergent paths. The first path, which Grably criticises, is one of stagnation and self-destruction. Artists who focus solely on perfecting basic forms, without innovation or exploration, risk creating art that is repetitive and devoid of deeper meaning. This path is likened to the destructive use of atomic energy, akin to an endless cycle of self-destruction and hollow displays of technical prowess. In contrast, Grably posits that the second path is one of innovation, exploration, and discovery. Grably champions this route, advocating for artists to search for new fundamental elements and to push the boundaries of artistic expression. The second path, much like the peaceful use of atomic energy, is filled with the potential for progress and positive impact. It is a journey of continuous exploration, where artists seek to uncover new ideas, techniques, and perspectives that enrich the art world and offer fresh insights into the human experience. Grably’s vision for art in the new era emphasises the importance of this innovative approach. Grably foresaw the year 2000 as a symbol of sophistication and progress across all fields, including art. 

By embracing the search for new fundamentals, artists can contribute to a cultural renaissance that reflects the complexities and advancements of contemporary society in the twenty-first century. Grably’s analogy has profound implications for both artists and the broader art world. For artists, it serves as a call to action to avoid the pitfalls of stagnation and to embrace the challenges of innovation. It encourages a mindset that values exploration and the continual push for new ideas, rather than the mere refinement of established forms. For academics, critics, collectors, and curators, Grably’s perspective offers a framework for evaluating and supporting art that prioritises creativity and forward-thinking notions and inclinations. Grably postulates that the true value of art lies not only in its technical execution but in its ability to challenge, provoke, and inspire. Grably's analogy between art and the atom is much more than a profound philosophical musing, it is a fundamental principle that visibly permeates his entire oeuvre. Grably’s comparison serves as a guiding light for understanding his approach to artistic creation, evident in the structure, composition, and emotional depth of his artworks. 

Through a detailed examination of Grably's artistic methods and thematic focus, over an extended period of more than five years, one can steadily observe how Grably’s atomic analogy materialises in the visual language that he employs in the realms of his creative artistic processes. Grably’s art, much like the atom, begins with the most basic and essential elements. He breaks down complex subjects into simple geometric forms and fundamental shapes, stripping away the extraneous to reveal the core essence. This reduction to basic components is not a simplification but a means to uncover the underlying structure that gives form and meaning to Grably’s creations. Each of Grably’s individual artworks resonates with the clarity and precision of atomic particles, meticulously and intentionally arranged to create a cohesive and compelling artistic whole. The interplay of forms and colors in Grably’s work mimics the dynamic interactions within an atom. In much the same way that the particles within an atom are in a state of constant motion, interacting and reacting to one another, the elements in Grably’s artistic compositions are charged with visceral energy and instinctive creative movement. 

Grably’s use of vibrant colors and bold lines creates a sense of kinetic energy, suggesting a universe in a perpetual state of flux. This dynamic quality is a testament to Grably’s understanding of art as an active, living process, continually evolving and responding to internal and external stimuli. Grably's analogy of the atom’s dual pathways, one leading to destruction, the other to creation, is vividly reflected in the thematic tension of his work. Grably explores the fine line between chaos and order, using his art to navigate the delicate balance between these opposing forces. In some of Grably’s works, there is a palpable sense of turmoil and fragmentation, echoing the destructive potential of atomic energy. However, alongside this, there is also a profound sense of renewal and creation, a testament to Grably’s belief in art’s ability to generate new ideas and perspectives. A key aspect of Grably's atomic analogy is the relentless pursuit of new fundamental elements. This search is evident in his innovative techniques and experimental approaches. Grably constantly pushes the boundaries of traditional mediums, exploring uncharted territories in texture, form, and composition. Grably’s quest for the unknown is a defining characteristic of his overall oeuvre, reflecting his commitment to discovering and expressing new artistic possibilities. Each of Grably’s pieces serves as an experiment, a step closer to understanding the elemental truths of his creative vision. Grably perceived himself as both the scientist and the artist, his mind the laboratory where raw ideas were distilled into pure elemental forms. Grably’s holistic approach to creation is evident in his seamless integration of concept and execution. Every stroke, colour choice, and compositional decision is imbued with intention, reflecting Grably’s deep contemplation of the fundamental principles of art. Grably’s meticulous attention to detail mirrors the precision required in scientific inquiry, highlighting the parallels between the creative and scientific processes.

While many artists throughout history have drawn analogies between art and other fields to infuse their work with philosophical and psychological depth, Grably’s comparison of art to the discovery of the atom stands out for its unique multidisciplinary resonance. However, several other artists and thinkers have also made profound analogies that have significantly impacted the artistic landscape. Leonardo da Vinci is perhaps the most renowned figure for blending art with scientific inquiry. His analogy between the artist and the scientist highlights a multidisciplinary approach to understanding the world. Leonardo da Vinci’s detailed anatomical sketches and his studies of light, perspective, and mechanics reflect a deep integration of artistic and scientific principles. He viewed art and science as complementary ways to explore and represent reality, fundamentally shaping Renaissance art with his interdisciplinary methodology. Wassily Kandinsky’s analogy between art and music introduced a new way of thinking about visual expression. Kandinsky believed that colours and forms could evoke emotions in the same way that music does. His concept of “Synesthesia”suggested that visual art could create a multi-sensory experience, where viewers could “hear” the colours and “feel” the compositions. This analogy had a profound impact on the development of abstract art, influencing generations of artists to explore the emotional and psychological potential of their work. Paul Klee often drew analogies between art and the processes of nature. He believed that art should reflect the underlying principles of natural growth and structure. His works frequently incorporate organic forms and patterns, suggesting a deep connection between the artist’s creative process and the natural world. Klee’s analogy reinforced the idea that art is an extension of natural phenomena, bridging the gap between the visible and the invisible, the known and the unknown. Marcel Duchamp’s analogy between art and everyday objects revolutionised the art world’s understanding of creativity and meaning. By presenting ordinary objects as “Readymades,” Duchamp challenged traditional notions of what constitutes art. His work suggested that art could be found in the mundane and that the artist’s role was to reveal the inherent beauty and significance of everyday life. This analogy had a profound philosophical and psychological impact, questioning the nature of art and the role of the artist in society. Mark Rothko’s analogy between art and spiritual experience emphasises the psychological depth of his work. Rothko viewed his colour field paintings as meditative spaces where viewers could experience transcendence. He believed that art had the power to evoke deep emotional responses and facilitate a connection with the sublime. This analogy infused his work with a spiritual dimension, inviting viewers to engage with art on a profound, introspective level.

Grably’s analogy between art and the discovery of the atom brings a distinctly unique philosophical and psychological depth to his oeuvre, and to a broader understanding of late twentieth century Israeli art. By comparing the foundational elements of art to the atom, the fundamental building block of all matter, Grably explores the dual potential for creation and destruction inherent in both. Grably’s work reflects a profound understanding of the elemental forces that shape existence, encouraging viewers to consider the dynamic interplay of order and chaos, simplicity and complexity. While Grably’s atomic analogy is unique in its multidisciplinary resonance, the history of art is rich with analogies that have imbued artistic practice with philosophical and psychological depth. From Leonardo da Vinci’s fusion of art and science to Kandinsky’s synthetic exploration of art and music, these analogies have expanded the boundaries of artistic expression and enriched our understanding of the creative process. Grably’s contribution stands alongside those of these historical figures, offering a fresh perspective on the elemental nature of art and its profound connection to the fabric of reality. Ultimately, Grably’s atomic analogy speaks to the universal nature of his work. Just as the atom is the building block of all matter, the themes that Grably relentlessly explores in his oeuvre, such as existence, identity, creation, and destruction, are all the fundamental elements of the human condition. Grably’s art transcends cultural and temporal boundaries, resonating on a deeply emotional and intellectual level. Through his exploration of these elemental themes, Grably invites viewers to reflect on their own place within the cosmos, challenging them to see the world through the lens of fundamental, uniquely human truths.

Grably’s “atom” analogy is a testament to his deep understanding of both the scientific and artistic realms. It reflects his belief in the transformative power of art to shape and reflect the human condition. By drawing parallels between the fundamental elements of art and the atom, Grably provides a powerful metaphor for his artistic journey, one that emphasises the importance of innovation, discovery, and the pursuit of new ideas. As the art world continues to evolve, Grably’s insights remind us of the critical balance between mastering foundational skills and daring to explore uncharted territories. Grably’s vision for the future of art challenges artists to be both scientists and creators, seeking the building blocks of beauty and meaning in a complex and ever-changing world. Grably's oeuvre is a testament to his profound understanding of the atomic principles of art. By reducing his subjects to their most basic elements, creating dynamic interactions, and continually seeking new fundamentals, Grably has crafted a body of work that is both deeply personal and universally resonant. His analogy of the atom not only provides a framework for Grably’s creative process but also offers a lens through which we can better appreciate the complexity and depth of his art. In Grably’s hands, the canvas became a microcosm of the universe, a place where the fundamental forces of creation and destruction play out in vivid detail. Grably’s work stands as a powerful reminder of the potential of art to reveal the elemental truths of our existence, challenging us to look beyond the surface and to further explore the deeper connections that bind us all.

Schulman, M & Various AI GPTs

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Grably, Ehud. "I compare art to the discovery of the atom, and by that it is possible to explain..." 1977; Ehud Grably (1961-1994), Hebrew Monologue published in Israel in 2017, Lilly and Nathan Raz; Editing and design: Jay Zimblock.
2. Nietzsche, Friedrich, Wilhelm. “The Portable Nietzsche.” Penguin Books, 1977.
3. Shlain, Leonard. "Art & Physics: Parallel Visions in Space, Time, and Light." William Morrow & Company, 2007.
4. Danto, Arthur C. "The Transfiguration of the Commonplace: A Philosophy of Art." Harvard University Press, 1981.
5. Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. "Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience." Harper Perennial, 2008.
6. Munari, Bruno. “Design as Art.” Penguin Books, 2009.
7. Baldwin, Zachary, D. “Theology.” Createspace Independent Publishing Platform, 2014.
8. Arnheim, Rudolf. "Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye." University of California Press, 2004.
9. Freud, Sigmund. “Leonardo da Vinci.” Createspace Independent Publishing Platform, 2014.
10. Emmerling, Leonhard. “Basquiat.” Taschen, 2015.
11. Luongo, Margaret. “History of Art.” Louisiana State University Press, 2016.
12. Prigogine, Ilya, and Isabelle Stengers. “Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature.” Verso Books, 2017.
13. da Vinci, Leonardo. “Leonardo da Vinci.” David & Charles, 2006.
14. Winicott, Michael. “Leonardo da Vinci: Creativity Lessons: Teachings from the Great Genius, His Works and his Life.” Createspace Independent Publishing Platform, 2015.
15. da Vinci, Leonardo. “The Drawings of Leonardo da Vinci.” Createspace Independent Publishing Platform, 2018.
16. da Vinci, Leonardo & Richter, Irma A. “Notebooks.” Oxford University Press, 2008.
17. Smith, Lacey, Belinda & Brockwell, Maurice W. “Leonardo da Vinci.” Createspace Independent Publishing Platform, 2017.
18. Stein Greenberg, Sarah & School, Stanford D. “Creative Acts for Curious People: How to Think, Create, and Lead in Unconventional Ways.” Ten Speed Press, 2021.
19. da Vinci, Leonardo. “Leonardo da Vinci and Anatomy.” Editions Skira, Paris, 2023. 
20. Calhoun, Cheshire. “Feminism, The Family, And the Politics of the Closet.” Oxford University Press, 2002.
21. Bonthuys, Elsje & Albertyn. “Gender, Law & Justice.” Juta & Co, 2007.
22. Patterson, Dennis. “An Anthology Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory.” Blackwell Publishing, 2006.